Sources & gaps
Find the sites AI cites and the sources behind recommendations that leave you out.
What you see
A recommendation often comes with source links. Sources lets you follow those links rather than stop at a dashboard total. Its Gaps view concentrates on answers that mention a competitor or a saved alternative but do not name your brand. That gives you a concrete starting point for a review profile, an editorial opportunity, a community discussion or a useful page on your own site.
- Cited domains labelled as your site, competitor, review site, community content, editorial, reference or other.
- A labelled share-by-class view and filters for the type of source you want to examine.
- Gap domains ranked by answer count, engine coverage and distinct competitors named.
- Expandable exact cited URLs, question and engine evidence, and links to full answers.
- Add to my plan actions, with competitor-owned cited pages shown separately.
Example, using invented brands
Most cited websites
Example, using invented brands- pmreviews.example45 citations
- agencytools.example45 citations
- northdesk.example23 citations
- agencyforum.example22 citations
- bramblework.example14 citations
How it works
Start with your brand domain, measurement language and country. Review the buyer questions before running a check. Optional brand context records what you do, key messages and facts AI should get right. Suggestions can help you get started, but you choose the questions and can keep, replace or skip near-duplicates. Once answers are saved, explore the report and open the evidence behind a finding. Weekly tracking reuses your saved questions and settings, so each check is comparable with the last.
What it doesn't do
A gap shows where AI looks today; earning a mention there doesn’t guarantee a change in the answer. We don’t measure backlinks or web traffic.